When is a ‘panda’ not a panda—and are any pandas actually bears? (2024)

Say 'panda' and immediately your mind goes big, fluffy, rare—and monochrome. But the infamously partner-picky, bamboo-chewing giant panda endemic to a sliver of China isn't the only creature to answer to the name.

There are in fact two distinct species that share this iconic title: the giant, and the red panda. But were you presented with a lineup and told to indicate the ‘panda’, one would stick out like a sore, rather red thumb. Despite it actually being the creature most entitled to the name.

Turning red. Or black and white?

Firstly, the most obvious difference. At a standing height of five to six feet and a weighing up to 250 pounds (113 kg), the giant panda—and its higher altitude, slightly slighter subspecies the Qinling panda—is roughly comparable to a stocky, weighty human.

The red panda, however, is roughly comparable to a weighty house cat. The giant panda looks like a black bear in a costume; the red panda looks like a racoon that's gone rusty. Complete with a resplendent, ringed tail, cheese-wedge ears and pointed snout, the red panda is thoroughly cute—but in a way that's thoroughly unlike the other creature with which it shares the ‘p’ word. But is it simply a case of lazy name-calling? Not quite.

Red in tooth and claw

The word ‘panda’ has an ambiguous origin, but one theory is that it is from either the Nepali nigalya ponya (‘bamboo eater’) or paja (‘claw’). One thing is certain, however— it was applied to the red panda first.

The animal was described by French zoologist Frédéric Cuvierin 1825, who added the scientific name Ailurus fulgens, literally, ‘shining cat.’ Not unforgivably, Cuvier judged the red panda as being a particularly anti-social member of the raccoon family.

“The red pandas are solitary and shy animals,” says Ang Phuri Sherpa, Nepal country director for conservation group The Red Panda Network. “They can be found in pairs at the time of their mating, and when cubs are accompanied by a mother.” Ang Phuri says the panda's name could have originated from another Nepali word, punde, which means ‘having white marks on their face,’ adding: “It is true in terms of etymology that red panda is the only ‘true’ panda.”

While pandas both giant and red share a common name, given their obvious physical differences you might expect them to not share a scientific name. Confusingly, they almost do. The giant panda's genus is Ailuropoda—which in this case means ‘cat-foot’, rather than simply ‘cat’.

And it's in the foot that these apparently dissimilar creatures share one of two fascinating common features: the ‘false thumb’, or modified sesamoid digit. These specially evolved front paws, each with an elongated wrist bone, allows the animals to manipulate the principle ingredient of their second common feature: diet. Both animals eat bamboo, and have developed this physical trait geared to gripping those tubular stalks, a phenomenon of adaptation to a shared environment known as convergent evolution.

This dietary quirk and their shared habitat in moist, misty mountainous areas of China certainly gives the two pandas something to talk about. But are they related?

Bearing up

The plot thickens when we consider how the giant panda got its name. It was a French missionary and naturalist named Père Armand David who, whilst roaming the Baoxing county in China's Sichuan Province, first brought the animal to western attention—in 1869, when he saw the shot carcass of a 'whitebear', as he called it. “I believe it to be a new species, not only because of its skin color, but also because of the hair beneath its feet and other characteristics,” he wrote in his journal.

To Armand David it certainly resembled a bear, with its bulky, shambling gait and thick fur. The locals called it a panda—it ate bamboo, after all—but Armand David disagreed, classifying it Ursus melanoleucus, or ‘black-white bear’. Excited by his find, he began a correspondence with Alphonse Milne-Edwards, a French zoologist, to whom he sent a pelt and a skull for inspection.

Furry fossils

Milne-Edwards questioned the strange creature's classification, claiming the skull, teeth and claws made it more physiologically aligned with a certain red haired, bamboo-eating member of the raccoon family described 40 years before—though clearly having climbed a good way along its own evolutionary branch. Publishing a description in his Recherches pour servir l’histoire naturelle des mammifčres, Milne-Edwards reclassified it accordingly as Ailuropus melanoleucus to reflect what he saw as at least a dotted line to the red panda.

The argument rumbles on. More recently DNA and molecular studieshave yielded contradictory results—with some claiming the pandas are in no way related to each other, and others suggesting giant pandas are true bears. Some claim red pandas are actually fancy mustelids—a family that includes weasels, badgers, wolverines, martens and polecats—and that both panda varieties have a streak of raccoon in there somewhere.

What seems unanimous is that neither animal sits contentedly into any group, with both often described as ‘living fossils’—the last of a particularly adventurous evolutionary line.

The red panda today remains in its very own family, Ailuridae. So too the giant panda, which—while firmly now in the family Ursidae (bears)—retains its unique genus of Ailuropoda. Both continue to be argued over, but with the uneasy consensus that both animals and all their speculated relatives likely shared a common, unfathomably ancient and mysterious ancestor. So heated has the subject around both pandas' place in the animal kingdom that it has prompted wider discussions around what features should be considered as taxonomic dealbreakers when classifying an animal.

In his 1993 book on the subject, The Last Panda,naturalist George B. Schaller acknowledged the classification argument with the peerlessly pithy:“When giving a lecture, I am often asked at the end whether the giant panda is a bear or raccoon. To keep my reply brief, I usually answer, ‘The panda is a panda.’”

Relative fame

So were the lines between the species boiled down, you could argue the giant panda is a bear, but not a panda—and the red panda is a panda, but not a bear.

While red pandas are getting a showcase of sorts in the Disney-Pixar movie Turning Red, there's no question the giant panda is the more iconic of the pair—despite the smaller animal facing its own very real challenges. Classified as endangered by the IUCN due to its declining population, the diminutive forest-dweller has suffered many of the same fates as its bigger namesake. “Their biggest threats in the wild are we, the human being,” says Ang Phuri Sherpa. “Their survival in the wild is highly [related to] the human-induced causes like deforestation and degradation of their habitats, poaching, illegal smuggling, and trade of their skin or pelts.” It's thought around 10,000 individuals remain in the wild.

As for the giant panda, following decades of declining populations due to the same habitat loss and poaching, it has become an enduring symbol of the need for wildlife conservation. Now with numbers around 1,900 in the wild and breeding programs worldwide to help assuage an already somewhat tricky procreation process, the giant panda was recently reclassified as vulnerable due to a slowly increasing population. Along the way it's become arguably the world's most recognisable animal—ironic, given its ambiguity within science.

In China, its largely serene countenance and 50/50 color scheme has been likened to the yinyang,the Chinese spiritual symbol denoting balance in opposites. And while the two panda species may seem similarly opposed—like the yin and yang themselves—each clearly has more than a little in common with the other.

Turning Redis streaming onDisney+.

This story was adapted from the National Geographic U.K website.

When is a ‘panda’ not a panda—and are any pandas actually bears? (2024)

FAQs

When is a ‘panda’ not a panda—and are any pandas actually bears? ›

The red panda is not related to the giant panda. The giant panda belongs to the Ursidae family (Bears) and the red panda belongs to its own taxonomically unique Family: Ailuridae. The giant panda and the red panda do however share some of the same characteristics and a common ancestor.

Are pandas actually bears? ›

For many decades, the precise taxonomic classification of the giant panda was under debate because it shares characteristics with both bears and raccoons. However in 1985, molecular studies indicate the giant panda is a true bear, part of the family Ursidae.

Are pandas basically bears? ›

Yes, a panda is a true bear and is part of the Ursidae family, though it is a bit of an ecological oddball since it exclusively lives on bamboo.

Are pandas a form of bear? ›

While the Giant Panda is a member of the bear family, a few habits separate the species from other bears. The panda bear's diet is pretty boring. Other bears eat almost anything. But most of the time, 90% in fact, the panda eats only bamboo.

Does panda count as a bear? ›

Red pandas are the only living members of their taxonomic family, Ailuridae, while giant pandas are in the bear family, Ursidae.

Do male pandas exist? ›

Male pandas are called boars, and females sows, just like pigs. In China, giant pandas are also known as 'white bear', 'bamboo bear' and 'large bear cat'. When playing, young pandas have been seen doing somersaults, body twists, and sliding down snowy slopes.

What bear is not a bear? ›

Do you think a koala is a bear? Keep reading to find the answer! Here's the truth: Despite some pop culture references to adorable “koala bears”, the species you can see all winter at Gumleaf Hideout is actually a marsupial, not a bear.

Has a panda ever attacked a human? ›

There are no records of a panda having killed a human, but past attacks clearly show you should exercise caution if entering a panda's space.

Is A Racoon a bear? ›

About Raccoons – Also Called "Procyon lotor"

Raccoons and bears belong to the same clade of carnivorous mammals, but they are not 'small bears'!

What is the closest animal to a panda? ›

The Giant Panda is in the Order Carnivora from the Class Mammalia. It is closely related to most every type of bear, but its closest relative is the Spectacled Bear (Tremarctos). It is also very closely related to raccoons (Procyonidae). The Giant Panda originated from the Caniformia or canine part of Carnivora.

Are pandas born female? ›

Genetic tests are the only way to discern the sex of a panda cub in the earliest weeks of its life. Not only are mothers incredibly protective of the cubs at this age, but pandas are also born without genitalia.

Can pandas eat meat? ›

While they are almost entirely vegetarian, pandas will sometimes hunt for pikas and other small rodents. Indeed, as members of the bear family, giant pandas possess the digestive system of a carnivore, although they have evolved to depend almost entirely on bamboo.

Why are pandas only found in China? ›

This remarkable terrain right in the center of China is the only place in the world well suited enough for the giant panda to survive in the wild. In addition, pandas and China have a similar past in terms of qualities and adaptability.

Do pandas have predators? ›

Panda's natural enemies and defences | WWF. A fully grown panda is far too formidable a foe for most predators, but some animals can prey on cubs. Potential predators include jackals, snow leopards and yellow-throated martens, all of which are capable of killing and eating panda cubs.

Are raccoons pandas? ›

Pandas and raccoons belong to different animal families, but red pandas can be considered somewhat of a distant cousin to the North American raccoon. This is so because scientists believe procyonids are related to the bear family to which the pandas belong.

Are pandas intelligent? ›

Pandas are intelligent animals with complex behaviour and a good memory. Their cognitive ability is comparable to that of chimpanzees and gorillas. However, their intelligence is often underestimated due to their slow-moving demeanour.

Are pandas bears or dogs? ›

The giant panda, a black-and-white bear, has a body typical of bears. It has black fur on its ears, eye patches, muzzle, legs, and shoulders. The rest of the animal's coat is white.

Are pandas similar to bears? ›

The giant panda with its distinctive black and white colouration and its diet of bamboo is almost always thought of as the most unique bear species in existence. In fact, it has been suggested by some that the giant panda is so uncommon that it is not a bear at all, and should be categorized in its very own Family.

Are pandas as aggressive as bears? ›

Giant pandas are solitary and peaceful animals, which will usually avoid confrontation, but if escape is impossible, they will certainly fight back. And as cuddly as they may look, pandas can protect themselves as well as most other bears by using their physical strength, and powerful jaws and teeth.

Is A panda A Marsupial or a bear? ›

Pandas are not classified as marsupials. They belong to the order Carnivora and the family Ursidae, which makes them true bears. Marsupials are a separate group of mammals, belonging to the infraclass Marsupialia, which includes animals like kangaroos, wallabies, and koalas.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Terrell Hackett

Last Updated:

Views: 6209

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (52 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Terrell Hackett

Birthday: 1992-03-17

Address: Suite 453 459 Gibson Squares, East Adriane, AK 71925-5692

Phone: +21811810803470

Job: Chief Representative

Hobby: Board games, Rock climbing, Ghost hunting, Origami, Kabaddi, Mushroom hunting, Gaming

Introduction: My name is Terrell Hackett, I am a gleaming, brainy, courageous, helpful, healthy, cooperative, graceful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.